Sincerely,

Jayson – wielder of The Ban Hammer™

Interesting.

Well I don’t want to upset you or have you think I’m trolling you Simon Paul so I will say this.

I simply asked you about the identity of the individual in your avatar and once you stated who it was, I simply stated that the facial features of the person in your avatar is atrocious.

You can use Google for searching but you are unable to proofread your sentences and don’t know the difference between “your” and “you’re”.

Good night Simon Paul aka spaulagain and God speed.

I see that first one went way over your head.

I’ll help you out with that second part, a simple Google search definition…
“make a deliberately offensive or provocative online posting with the aim of upsetting someone or eliciting an angry response from them.”

You deliberately called me ugly and specifically asked if it made me angry. Then continued to try to elicit angry responses. Failing miserably of course because I’m just trolling the troll here. And I didn’t call you a troll, I just implied it. Your comments are doing all the talking here and your comment history on Disqus makes it even more obvious.

Anyways, you’re boring. So I’m moving on. Yawwwwnnn….

Congratulations, you can quote a movie…sort off.

Why are you calling me a troll? I didn’t do anything to you.

I find your lack of creativity disturbing. Most trolls at least try to antagonize with other methods. Maybe you should try a new profession.

Congratulation, you can form a sentence without grammatical errors!

Now if only we could fix the facial features of the individual in your avatar, the world would be a better place my friend.

Congratulations, you can quote a movie!

Sure…if you say so.

Anger leads to the Darkside.

Or maybe I just don’t care? There’s no anger here, just entertaining watching you try so hard.

It’s “your” not “you’re”, Simon.

You’re letting your anger cloud your grammatical judgement.