Comments on: AT-ACT Scale Confirmed As Much Taller Than AT-AT https://yakfaceforums.com/main/2016/10/14/at-act-scale-confirmed-as-much-taller-than-at-at/ Serving Star Wars Collectors Worldwide Sat, 15 Oct 2016 02:15:00 +0000 hourly 1 By: Bombadgungan https://yakfaceforums.com/main/2016/10/14/at-act-scale-confirmed-as-much-taller-than-at-at/#comment-25106 Sat, 15 Oct 2016 02:15:00 +0000 https://yakfaceforums.com/main/?p=30996#comment-25106 In reply to General Hux.

Fuel for the fire my friend.

And right on cue… here come the complaints…

]]> By: Bombadgungan https://yakfaceforums.com/main/2016/10/14/at-act-scale-confirmed-as-much-taller-than-at-at/#comment-25105 Sat, 15 Oct 2016 02:15:00 +0000 https://yakfaceforums.com/main/?p=30996#comment-25105 In reply to Shawn O’Connor.

Your ideas would never make it past accounting.

]]> By: Etheangel2220 https://yakfaceforums.com/main/2016/10/14/at-act-scale-confirmed-as-much-taller-than-at-at/#comment-25090 Sat, 15 Oct 2016 00:31:00 +0000 https://yakfaceforums.com/main/?p=30996#comment-25090 I wonder if the legs are the same size as the regular at-at, but the body compartment itself is just taller.

]]> By: Paulskywalker https://yakfaceforums.com/main/2016/10/14/at-act-scale-confirmed-as-much-taller-than-at-at/#comment-25081 Fri, 14 Oct 2016 21:32:00 +0000 https://yakfaceforums.com/main/?p=30996#comment-25081 So the Hasbro AT ACT is even more underscaled. There you go General Hux

]]> By: Rivesjunctionite https://yakfaceforums.com/main/2016/10/14/at-act-scale-confirmed-as-much-taller-than-at-at/#comment-25063 Fri, 14 Oct 2016 18:35:00 +0000 https://yakfaceforums.com/main/?p=30996#comment-25063 This is much better.

]]> By: General Hux https://yakfaceforums.com/main/2016/10/14/at-act-scale-confirmed-as-much-taller-than-at-at/#comment-25057 Fri, 14 Oct 2016 17:18:00 +0000 https://yakfaceforums.com/main/?p=30996#comment-25057 In reply to Rivesjunctionite.

Exactly like that.

]]> By: Rivesjunctionite https://yakfaceforums.com/main/2016/10/14/at-act-scale-confirmed-as-much-taller-than-at-at/#comment-25056 Fri, 14 Oct 2016 17:16:00 +0000 https://yakfaceforums.com/main/?p=30996#comment-25056 In reply to General Hux.

Like this, then?
https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/56035a2d4d0c01c6d94d9fd5702e263a73e796af513a97653cef2e0caf660c1a.jpg

]]> By: General Hux https://yakfaceforums.com/main/2016/10/14/at-act-scale-confirmed-as-much-taller-than-at-at/#comment-25055 Fri, 14 Oct 2016 17:15:00 +0000 https://yakfaceforums.com/main/?p=30996#comment-25055 In reply to Rivesjunctionite.

They are EXACTLY the same length and height.

]]> By: General Hux https://yakfaceforums.com/main/2016/10/14/at-act-scale-confirmed-as-much-taller-than-at-at/#comment-25054 Fri, 14 Oct 2016 17:14:00 +0000 https://yakfaceforums.com/main/?p=30996#comment-25054 Let me guess, this will turn into a complaint section about how small Hasbro’s AT-ACT is?

]]> By: Rivesjunctionite https://yakfaceforums.com/main/2016/10/14/at-act-scale-confirmed-as-much-taller-than-at-at/#comment-25053 Fri, 14 Oct 2016 17:04:00 +0000 https://yakfaceforums.com/main/?p=30996#comment-25053 OK, so that means the actual vehicles in-universe, right?
Is there a comparison photo of the AT-ACT next to a vintage AT-AT or BAT-AT yet? I’d like to know how the toys compare.

]]>